Global Biodiversity Tracking: A Framework Still Too Incomplete to Turn Ambition into Action
- Samantha Liu
- Jun 24
- 1 min read
A June 10, 2025 article in Nature Ecology & Evolution reveals a glaring weakness in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: current indicators only cover 47% of the global targets, leaving 12% entirely untracked. For companies bound by TNFD, CSRD, CSDDD, this is a critical gap.

Why This Shortfall Matters:
Incomplete data hinders decision-making. Companies need clear, comparable biodiversity data to:
Understand impacts and dependencies
Anticipate financial & reputational risks
Build credible reporting for stakeholders
Limited data granularity prevents meaningful local/sectoral management
Researchers Recommend:
Strengthen national-level biodiversity monitoring
Develop harmonized datasets compatible with TNFD
Integrate data from businesses, NGOs, territories, researchers
DT Master Carbon’s Perspective:
This is a wake-up call: meeting Kunming-Montreal goals demands business-driven data. Companies must go beyond compliance, aligning strategy to global targets:
Leverage biodiversity signals from agri-industrial-forestry practices
Combine local proxies and ecosystem-level data with global frameworks
Transforming Gaps into Opportunities:
Standardize corporate biodiversity data
Foster public–private data partnerships
Engage regulators and investors strategically